to 5pm Pacific Time M-F
- ADA & Accessibility...
- Architecture...
- Business Management
- Calculators
- Codes...
- Concrete-Masonry
- DBIA Model Contracts
- Design-Build
- Electrical...
- Engineering...
- Estimating...
- Exam Prep/Licensing...
- Facilities Management
- Finance
- Finishes & Painting
- Fire & Safety...
- Forms and Letters...
- Green Building
- Homebuilding
- Inspection
- Legal
- Management...
- Marketing
- Plumbing-HVAC
- Public Works
- Reference
- Roofing
- Security
- Specifications
- Steel-Metals
- Sustainability
- Videos & DVD's
- Water - Wastewater
- Welding...
- Wood-Carpentry
New Department of Energy Rule Limits Choices for Elderly and Disabled, Says NAHB
The National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) has asked the federal Department of Energy (DOE) to rethink a new "interpretive rule" that changes the regulatory definition of a showerhead and that could prohibit from sale many hand-held devices that improve the shower’s accessibility for the elderly or disabled.
Under DOE’s new interpretation, the Environmental Protection Agency’s allowable gallons-per-minute flow rate would apply to the entire showerhead plumbing device -- everything past the mixing valves or user controls. Such an interpretation would be a significant shift for most showerhead manufacturers, which now apply those rates to each individual showerhead.
“DOE said the change is intended to improve water efficiency, which is a goal we support. Unfortunately, the solution goes too far,” said NAHB Chairman Bob Jones, a builder and developer in Bloomfield Hills, Mich.
“This is going to make it much more difficult for older Americans to live independently. Under the new definition, replacing a traditional, single showerhead with one that includes a flexible hose to take a shower while seated will result in half the water pressure for each – which would be too weak for either one,” Jones said.
The rule also potentially bans the installation of spa-style showers and similar features popular with many new home buyers – limiting consumer choice, but not necessarily saving water. “The government would have to come up with a ruling regarding the number of showers people are allowed to take and how many minutes they can last – and I don’t think any agency is prepared to go that far, for good reason,” Jones added.
“Had the agency gone through the typical notice-and-comment process, in which manufacturers, suppliers, builders and consumers have an opportunity to review and offer suggestions for improvement, DOE might have addressed these concerns in a more equitable and informed manner,” Jones said.
*free shipping on domestic ground shipments only




